data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db415/db4159e5e42e7ff70ee3cd5521c3127b64f36c8c" alt="Fisheries staff using a 50 foot seine to capture fish in nearshore habitat"
Fish-based index of biological integrity
The DNR developed fish-based IBIs by sampling a wide range of lakes, from high-quality lakes to those with significantly degraded water quality or shoreline habitat. A statistical analysis found a relationship between the fish communities and water quality and physical habitat characteristics. Additional details about this process can be found in the development of fish-based IBIs for Minnesota lakes journal article.The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has developed similar IBIs to assess biological communities in streams and rivers in Minnesota. For more information on these IBIs, go to the MPCA index of biological integrity and biological monitoring of water in Minnesota webpages.Different IBIs for different lake types
Four fish-based IBIs were developed to accurately evaluate different types of lakes and expectations for their associated fish communities. For example, healthy shallower lakes have different indicator species than deeper lakes and healthy lakes with more complex shaped shorelines have more fish species than lakes with rounder shaped shorelines.- Deep lakes with complex shaped shorelines
- Lake type:
Very deep and large with complex shoreline, primarily located in central and northern MinnesotaFish species diversity in a "healthy" lake:
High - average of 28 native speciesFish commonly sampled that are sensitive to water quality and habitat changes:- Bluegill, Pumpkinseed and Rock Bass
- Cisco
- Smallmouth and Largemouth Bass, Northern Pike, Muskellunge and Walleye
- Several darter species
- Several shiner species
- Common Carp
- Black Bullhead
- Green Sunfish
- Moderately deep lakes with rounder shorelines
- Lake type:
Moderately deep with a rounder shoreline, primarily located in central and northern MinnesotaFish species diversity in a "healthy" lake:
Intermediate - average of 21 native speciesFish commonly sampled that are sensitive to water quality and habitat changes:- Bluegill, Pumpkinseed and Rock Bass
- Cisco
- Largemouth Bass, Northern Pike, Muskellunge and Walleye
- One or more darter species
- One or more shiner species
- Common Carp
- Black Bullhead
- Green Sunfish
- Moderately shallow, heavily vegetated lakes
- Lake type:
Moderately shallow, heavily vegetated, naturally productive, primarily located in central and northern Minnesota.Fish species diversity in a "healthy" lake:
Low - average of 18 native speciesFish commonly sampled that are sensitive to water quality and habitat changes:- Bluegill and Pumpkinseed
- Largemouth Bass, Northern Pike, and Walleye
- One or more shiner species
- Common Carp
- Black Bullhead
- Green Sunfish
- Shallow lakes
- Lake type:
Shallow (80-100% of the lake area less than 15 feet deep), naturally productive, primarily located in southern and central MinnesotaFish species diversity in a "healthy" lake:
Intermediate - average of 21 native speciesFish commonly sampled that are sensitive to water quality and habitat changes:- Bluegill
- Northern Pike
- One or more darter species
- Common Carp
- Black Bullhead
- Green or Orangespotted Sunfish
- Fathead Minnow
Fish sampling and IBI score calculation
There are many different methods to sample fish in a lake, and each method targets different kinds of fish. The DNR uses gill netting, trap netting, seining and backpack electrofishing (pictured at the top of this page) to collect the fish community information needed to calculate an IBI score for a lake.Once the fish have been collected, they are identified to species, counted, weighed, measured and released back into the lake when possible. Information on the number of species and quantity of individuals collected are used to calculate the IBI score. Fish IBI survey data and reports for individual lakes can be found on the MNDNR LakeFinder webpage.The fish-based IBI incorporates multiple measurements of the fish community. When the measurements are added together, they produce a score that reflects the lake's biological health.Each IBI score is generated using between eight and fifteen calculated measurements, depending on lake type. Examples include either raw counts or proportions of species that are classified as: native, intolerant, tolerant, vegetation-dwelling, small benthic-dwelling, insectivorous, carnivorous, omnivorous, or belonging to the cyprinid (i.e., minnows and shiners) family. More information about these measurements and the species included in each can be found on the classification of fish species in Minnesota lakes webpage. IBI scores can be found in the MN Geospatial Commons or on the Watershed Health Assessment Framework: Lakes webpage.These measurements are known to correspond with varying levels of human-caused stress from activities such as land use alteration within a lake’s watershed and physical habitat alteration along a lake’s shoreline.Assessing Minnesota lakes
The fish-based IBI is one important component that is considered during the MPCA watershed assessment process. Specifically, it is the primary tool used to assess whether a lake fully supports aquatic life. Similarly, the MPCA lake monitoring program uses physical measurements of water quality such as water clarity and amount of phosphorus to assess whether a lake fully supports aquatic recreation. These measurements represent a snapshot in time of lake conditions whereas the biological community as measured by the IBI reflects changes to the lake over several years or more. Together, these assessments provide important information to guide Clean Water planning and restoration. Specific aquatic life use assessment decisions are also available in the MN Geospatial Commons.Lake assessment categories
Fish-based IBI scores are used by DNR staff to place lakes into one of six assessment categories: exceptional, fully supporting, vulnerable, not supporting (impaired), inconclusive information and insufficient information. Often, multiple scores are considered when making an assessment on an individual lake. The assessment decisions can be used by MPCA, local governments and conservation groups, lake associations and homeowners to guide future lake management actions.- Exceptional
- The healthiest lakes that have high quality habitat and support the most diverse fish communities. These lakes have IBI scores above an established exceptional threshold. They are a top priority for protection, especially those at risk of future land use change or shoreline development.
- Fully supporting
- Healthy lakes that support diverse fish communities. These lakes have IBI scores above an established impairment threshold. They are a priority for protection, and some restoration may also be recommended.
- Vulnerable
- Lakes that are somewhat degraded but still support ecosystem functions. These lakes have IBI scores near an established impairment threshold. They are a top priority for restoration and protection of remaining quality habitat. These lakes are included in a formal stressor identification process.
- Not supporting (impaired)
- Lakes that are degraded and where sensitive fish species typically no longer live. These lakes have IBI scores below an established impairment threshold. They are a top priority for restoration, which can sometimes be extensive. These lakes are added to Minnesota’s Impaired Waters List and are included in a formal stressor identification process.
- Inconclusive information
- Sampling yielded enough data, but results were conflicting or very near an impairment threshold and prevented the ability to make a clear determination about the health of the lake.
- Insufficient information
- Sampling did not yield enough data to make a clear determination about the health of the lake.
Maps
Maps of lakes sampled and watersheds assessed based on the fish-based IBI. Click each individual map to enlarge.Identifying stressors to impaired and vulnerable lakes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe2a9/fe2a93fed1135e8184f0b2b111685649f72b06a1" alt="lakes in three states: natural, shoreline development, intensive agricultural"
IBI program contacts
Name | Position | Phone | |
---|---|---|---|
Jacquelyn Bacigalupi | Program Supervisor | 218-203-4315 | [email protected] |
Derek Bahr | Research Scientist | 218-203-4310 | [email protected] |
Lucas Borgstrom | Biologist | 218-203-4316 | [email protected] |
Aaron Sundmark | Biologist | 218-203-4309 | [email protected] |
Jessica Massure | Biologist | 218-203-4319 | [email protected] |
Stephanie Simon | Biologist (EWR*) | 218-308-2465 | [email protected] |
Josh Knopik | Biologist (EWR) | 218-203-4364 | [email protected] |
*EWR: Ecological and Water Resources Division
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa249/fa249b5d4f1dff8973d6be26b1f432f26ed05e19" alt="map showing staff contact areas"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75d9a/75d9a2f3db81e5963eb821a2b738de4f49590dd9" alt="Legacy Amendment logo"